Comments and Reviews

Sustaining Development and Resilience in SIDS: Beyond Crisis Management

Sustaining Development and Resilience in SIDS: Beyond Crisis Management

by Leisa Perch and Rathin Roy, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth

Human development in small island development states (SIDS) has been steady and measured as high. The Caribbean, on average, ranks higher than the Pacific on the Human Development Index (HDI): Barbados is ranked at 37, and St. Kitts and Nevis at 50, compared to Samoa at 94 and Fiji at 108 (UNDP, 2009). In general, the SIDS invest more than other countries in education and health; on average, government spending accounts for more than 60 per cent of all spending in the health sector (Perch and Roy, 2010).

http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCOnePager113.pdf

Posted at 10:59AM Jul 22, 2010 by IPC in Inclusive Growth  |  Comments[0]

How Much Do Non-Cash Components and Externalities Affect the Impact of Cash Transfers?

 How Much Do Non-Cash Components and Externalities Affect the Impact of Cash Transfers?

by Rafael Perez Ribas, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Fábio Veras Soares and Clarissa Teixeira, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth; Elydia Silva, Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES); and Guilherme Hirata, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro

Much of the debate about conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes revolves around the issues of targeting and conditionalities. Despite the many impact evaluations of CCT programmes, mostly in Latin America, there is little evidence on either the effect of the cash alone or the value added by the conditionality.

 The cash component has an income effect that allows families to consume more goods and services, including healthcare and schooling. Depending on the families’ preferences, this rise in income may also lead to a change in the consumption share of goods and services. Because of non-cash components, however, there might be a substitution effect that changes the way in which households spend their income, aside from the expected changes due to the increased income. Thus the question is how these other components change household behaviour in terms of the consumption pattern.

Download: http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCOnePager111.pdf

Posted at 11:37AM Jul 14, 2010 by IPC in Social Protection and CCTs  |  Comments[0]

Can Public Works and Employment Programmes Be More than Safety Nets?

Can Public Works and Employment Programmes Be More than Safety Nets?

By  Radhika Lal

 Public works and public employment programmes (PEPs) have long been considered a staple of social assistance. For the most part, though, they have been designed as “safety nets”
in the context of counter-cyclical programme interventions and responses to shocks. In some cases they have also focused on reducing poverty or addressing structural unemployment challenges over the longer term, but they have seldom been implemented on a scale that would make a dent in structural poverty. Recent advances in conceptualising and implementing scalable PEPs suggest that these programmes also have a broader development role to play.

http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCOnePager112.pdf

Posted at 11:36AM Jul 14, 2010 by IPC in Social Protection and CCTs  |  Comments[0]